Ghana is currently experiencing a severe economic crisis and relies heavily on international financial assistance. The finance ministry has estimated that the country could lose a total of $3.8 billion in World Bank funding if the president signs the anti-LGBTQ+ bill. This funding loss would have a significant impact on Ghana’s economic recovery, potentially derailing efforts to stabilize the exchange rate, reduce inflation, and boost growth.
The United States, United Kingdom, and numerous human rights organizations have condemned the anti-LGBTQ+ bill. The US, which is a major donor to Ghana, has expressed concerns that the bill violates fundamental human rights and could undermine bilateral relations. Additionally, the World Bank has indicated that it may reconsider its support for Ghana if the bill becomes law. Facing international pressure, President Nana Akufo-Addo is facing a difficult decision that could strain diplomatic ties and jeopardize vital financial assistance.
Even before the bill was passed by parliament, human rights groups initiated legal proceedings to challenge its constitutionality. The Supreme Court is expected to hear the case, though the timing is uncertain. President Akufo-Addo has seven days to sign the bill into law, after which he has 14 days to provide reasons if he chooses not to do so. By recommending that he wait for the Supreme Court’s ruling, the finance ministry is urging the president to prioritize legal considerations and avoid further political and economic controversy.
The anti-LGBTQ+ bill has been met with widespread criticism from rights groups and activists who view it as a severe violation of fundamental freedoms. The bill criminalizes individuals for their sexual orientation and gender identity, and its broad definition of “LGBTQ+ activities” could be used to target anyone who expresses support for or engages with LGBTQ+ individuals or organizations. Human rights defenders argue that the bill sends a harmful message of discrimination and intolerance.
Ghana’s decision on the anti-LGBTQ+ bill could have implications for other countries in the region and beyond. Several African nations have passed or are considering similar laws, and Ghana’s actions could set a precedent. By rejecting the bill or allowing it to be struck down by the Supreme Court, Ghana could send a positive signal to other countries that human rights and inclusion should be upheld.
Ghana’s finance ministry’s warning to President Akufo-Addo is a clear indication of the potential consequences of signing the anti-LGBTQ+ bill. The significant economic implications, political pressure, and human rights concerns should be carefully considered. As the president deliberates on his next steps, the international community awaits his decision with a keen interest in Ghana’s future trajectory on issues of equality and social progress.
Gilbert Machokoto, a former teacher, said that setting up a business in the late 1980s, shortlyafter Zimbabwe's independence, was ‘like…
Following elections in which the party that had ruled the diamond-rich nation for almost 60years suffered a historic setback. Botswana's…
A lightning strike at a refugee camp in Uganda kills 14 people including children with 34 othershospitalized. The incident happened…
From TV hopeful to red carpet royalty, Kuhle Adams' journey is a remarkable story of talentand perseverance. Beginning as an…
A new dawn in African football dawns as Jackline Juma is set to become the firstwoman to coach a men’s…
Last Friday Kithure Kindiki was again inaugurated as Kenya's new deputy president followinglegal challenges by his predecessor.The man who Kindiki…
This website uses cookies.