Sudan’s Shifting Alliances: Concerns Rise Over Iranian Influence on the Sudanese Army

Iranian Influence in Sudan: An Emerging Threat

Amidst the geopolitical landscape of the Middle East, concerns are escalating over the Sudanese army’s alignment with Iran and the potential consequences for regional stability. Observers fear that, echoing Iranian proxies in Lebanon, Iraq, Syria, and Yemen, the Sudanese army could become a fifth militia for Iran. This alignment, rooted in shared ideologies, raises questions about Sudan’s role as a potential pawn in Iran’s broader regional strategy.

Arms Supply and Drone Incidents: Signs of Iranian Support

Recent developments, exemplified by a video depicting members of the Rapid Support Forces carrying the wreckage of an Iranian-made drone, underscore the growing ties between Sudan and Iran. Reports by Bloomberg indicate that Iran is supplying the Sudanese military with weapons and drones, particularly the “Mohajer 6” model. The strategic importance of Sudan, with its proximity to Yemen, Saudi Arabia, and Israel, makes it an attractive location for Iran to establish a foothold in an economic corridor.

Islamist Orientation: A Catalyst for Concern

The Sudanese army’s Islamist orientation further amplifies worries about its potential transformation into a militia group, akin to the Iraqi Popular Mobilization Forces. With a historical connection to extremist allies that led to Sudan’s international isolation and sanctions, the current alignment raises red flags. The call for “popular resistance” and arming residents intensifies concerns about the army’s trajectory under Islamist influences.

Keep Reading

• Darfur Atrocities Persist: ICC Prosecutor Points to Sudanese Armed Forces and RSF
• From Sudan to Gaza, Iran’s influence over Middle East holds no signs of dropping
• Iran’s Drone Diplomacy in Sudan: Unraveling a Complex Alliance
• Sudan’s Escalating Crisis Sparks a Warning of Increased Refugee Influx to Europe

Sudan’s Strategic Importance: A Regional Chessboard

The geopolitical chessboard in the Middle East sees foreign actors hedging their bets on various factions within Sudan. As the internal conflict persists, there is a palpable desire from Iran and its allies to gain control over the Islamic Movement axis, known as “Kizan.” The suspension of the Jeddah platform and the breakdown of negotiations add complexity to the situation. The Sudanese government’s rejection of the Intergovernmental Authority on Development (IGAD) initiative further fuels tensions, leaving the door open for external forces to exploit the fragile state of affairs.

Sudan’s Historical Ties with Extremists: A Troubling Past

Sudan’s history of harbouring extremists and jihadists, from both the far right and the far left, adds a layer of complexity to the current scenario. Notorious figures such as Osama bin Laden, along with groups like Hamas and Hezbollah, found refuge in Sudan during previous regimes. The country’s association with state-sponsored terrorism has deep roots, raising concerns about the resurgence of extremist elements as Sudan navigates its political landscape.

The Sudanese Army’s Alignment with Iranian Interests: The Unsettling Alliance

The recent announcement of discussions between Iran and Sudan to restore bilateral relations has raised eyebrows globally. The prospect of Sudan providing Iran with a strategic foothold in the Red Sea, potentially dominating crucial ports, poses significant geopolitical implications. The alleged promise from Islamic Movement leaders to cooperate with Iran in exchange for military support adds a new dimension to Sudan’s role in the Iranian sphere of influence.

The Beja Factor: Ethnic Dynamics and Potential Implications

The Beja tribes in Sudan, particularly those under Nazir Mohamed Al-Amin Turk’s leadership, are crucial to the intricate dynamics. Turk, associated with both the National Congress Party and the Islamic Movement, supports Lieutenant General Abdel Fattah al-Burhan, the leader of the Sudanese army. The Beja tribes, historically marginalised, present both an obstacle and an opportunity in the struggle for control over Sudan’s ports and influence in the Red Sea region.

Potential Militarization of Sudan: A Fifth Militia for Iran?

As the Sudanese army faces accusations of being supported by Islamist leaders linked to the former regime, concerns mount over the potential militarization of Sudan under Iranian influence. The historical ties between the Islamist Movement, often referred to as “Kizan,” and Iran, particularly through figures like Hassan al-Turabi, raise questions about the trajectory of the Sudanese military. The fears of Sudan becoming a fifth militia for Iran, joining the ranks of Hezbollah, Popular Mobilization Forces, Zainabiyoun, and Houthi militia, gain prominence.

Sudan’s Role in the Regional Power Play: A Cause for Global Concern

The alignment between Sudan and Iran, coupled with the Sudanese army’s Islamist orientation, presents a cause for global concern. With Sudan situated strategically on the Red Sea, neighbouring Yemen, Saudi Arabia, and Israel, the potential for Iran and its allies to establish dominance in this critical economic corridor adds to the geopolitical complexity. The global community watches closely as Sudan navigates a delicate balance between internal conflicts and external influences.

Navigating a Precarious Path

Sudan finds itself at a crossroads, grappling with internal conflicts, historical ties to extremism, and the looming spectre of increased Iranian influence. The alignment of the Sudanese army with Iran raises concerns about the militarization of the nation and its potential role as a pawn in regional power dynamics. As geopolitical tensions escalate, the world awaits the unfolding chapters in Sudan’s complex narrative, with implications reverberating far beyond its borders.